(output below formatted to fit)
column file_name heading 'Archive Log' format a80 column applied heading 'Applied' format a30 select file_name, sequence#, timestamp, decode(applied,'NO',applied||' - Not Applied Logs!','YES',applied||' - OK',applied) applied from dba_logstdby_log order by sequence#; Archive Log SEQUENCE# TIMESTAMP Applied -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------------------- ------------------------------ /oradata/MYDB/arch/logapplyarch/arch1_1247463_699468119.log 1247463 10.AUG.2012 16:16:33 CURRENT /oradata/MYDB/arch/logapplyarch/arch1_1247464_699468119.log 1247464 10.AUG.2012 16:17:04 CURRENT ... ...
The 10.2 documentation doesn't give many details:
"APPLIED, Indicates whether each archive log has been applied (YES) or not (NO)"
The 11.2 documentation has more details:
"APPLIED, CURRENT - SQL Apply is currently applying changes contained in the foreign archived log"
"Since transactions can span multiple archived log files, multiple archived log files may show the value CURRENT in the APPLIED column."
To resolve: On the Primary look for a session that has a lock requested around the time when the first (oldest) 'CURRENT' archive log appeared (16:16:33 in the above).
set linesize 500 column program format a40 column event format a30 column username format a15 column osuser format a15 column lock_requested format a30 heading 'Lock Requested' column object_name format a30 select s.sid, s.serial#, s.username, s.osuser, s.program, s.event, l.type, decode(l.lmode, 0, 'NONE', 1, 'NULL', 2, 'ROW SHARE', 3, 'ROW EXCLUSIVE', 4, 'SHARE', 5, 'SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE', 6, 'EXCLUSIVE', '?') "Mode", decode(l.request, 0, 'NONE', 1, 'NULL', 2, 'ROW SHARE', 3, 'ROW EXCLUSIVE', 4, 'SHARE', 5, 'SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE', 6, 'EXCLUSIVE', '?') "Request", o.object_name, to_char(sysdate-l.ctime / 86400,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') lock_requested from v$lock l, dba_objects o, v$session s where l.id1 = o.object_id (+) and l.sid = s.sid order by l.sid, l.type / SID SERIAL# USERNAME OSUSER PROGRAM EVENT TY Mode Request OBJECT_NAME Lock Requested --------- ----------------------- ------ ------------------------- ------------------------------ -- ------------------- ------------- ------------------ ----------------------------- ... 113 34978 SCOTT scott prog@tigerserv (TNS V1-V3) SQL*Net message from client TM ROW EXCLUSIVE NONE scott25X 10-AUG-2012 16:16:32 113 34978 SCOTT scott prog@tigerserv (TNS V1-V3) SQL*Net message from client TM ROW EXCLUSIVE NONE scott25J 10-AUG-2012 16:16:32 113 34978 SCOTT scott prog@tigerserv (TNS V1-V3) SQL*Net message from client TM ROW EXCLUSIVE NONE scott25I 10-AUG-2012 16:16:32 113 34978 SCOTT scott prog@tigerserv (TNS V1-V3) SQL*Net message from client TX EXCLUSIVE NONE ... ...Above there was a DML lock at 16:16:32 on the Primary. Investigate why the session has uncommitted transactions. There is nothing necessarily wrong but if the Standby has been uncharacteristically building up 'CURRENT' applied logs for hours or the filesystem is starting to fill up with shipped archive logs then maybe there is an SQL performance problem or it could be something as simple as a user has not exited their session.
No comments:
Post a Comment